1. Introduction

In March 2022, Kyowa Hakko Bio Company Ltd, Japan (“the applicant”) submitted a full novel food application for the authorisation of 6’-sialyllactose (6’-SL) sodium salt. The novel food is a water soluble white to off-white powder composed of ≥ 82.0% w/w dry matter (DM) of 6’-SL sodium salt, which is manufactured by microbial fermentation using a genetically modified strain of Escherichia coli W. 6’-SL sodium salt is intended to be used as a source of human identical milk oligosaccharide.

The FSA and FSS have undertaken a safety assessment for 6’-SL sodium salt under the novel foods legislation, assimilated Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. To support the safety assessment, the ACNFP provided the advice outlined in this opinion to the FSA and FSS.

The evaluation by the ACNFP assessed the food safety risks of the novel food and its production, in line with Article 7 of assimilated Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2469. The regulatory framework and the technical guidance put in place by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) for full novel food applications is retained as the basis and structure for the assessment (EFSA NDA Panel, 2021).

Following the review by the ACNFP in September 2023, further information was requested from the applicant concerning the identity, the production process, the compositional information, the stability, the nutritional information, toxicological information, and allergenicity information on 6’-SL sodium salt, in order to address information gaps in the initial dossier. The final advice from the Committee was agreed at the 165th meeting, allowing the FSA and FSS to complete the risk assessment.

This document outlines the conclusions of the FSA and FSS on the safety of 6’-SL sodium salt as a novel food.

2. Assessment

2.1. Identity of the novel food

The novel food is a white to off-white powder which is mainly composed of 6’-SL sodium salt (≥ 82.0% w/w DM). Other saccharides are present in smaller quantities: sialic acid (≤ 6.0% w/w DM), D-glucose (≤ 3.0% w/w DM), D-lactose (≤ 3.0% w/w DM), 6’-sialyllactulose and 3’-SL sodium salt (≤ 5.0% w/w DM, sum of both) and a small fraction of other related saccharides (sum of other carbohydrates ≤ 13.0% w/w DM).

6’-SL is a trisaccharide consisting of D-glucose, D-galactose, and sialic acid (N-acetyl neuraminic acid) (see figure 1). This is identical to the structure of 6’-SL in human breast milk.

A black background with a black square  Description automatically generated with medium confidence
Figure 1.The structural formula of 6’-SL

6’-SL is classified as a purified chemical substance and characterised by the following information:

  • IUPAC name Sodium; (2R,4S,5R,6R)-5-acetamido-4-hydroxy-6-
    [(1R,2R)-1,2,3-trihydroxypropyl]-2-
    [[(2R,3R,4S,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-[(2R,3R,4R,5R)-
    1,2,4,5-tetrahydroxy-6-oxohexan-
    3-yl] oxyoxan-2-yl] methoxy]oxane-2-carboxylate

  • CAS number 157574-76-0

  • Molecular weight 655.53 g/mol

  • Molecular formula C23H38NO19Na

The structure of 6’-SL sodium salt in the novel food was confirmed using liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy: 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and two-dimensional (2D) NMR studies including COSY (correlation spectroscopy), TOCSY (total correlation spectroscopy), HETCOR (heteronuclear correlation) and HMBC (heteronuclear multiple bond correlation) methodologies.

2D-NMR analysis using high purity standards of 6’-SL sodium salt and 3’-SL sodium salt, a conformational isomer of 6’-SL sodium salt, demonstrated that the sialic acid is linked to D-galactose by α-(2’‘-6’) bonds. This provides unequivocal evidence on the structure of 6’-SL sodium salt.

High-performance liquid chromatography – charged aerosol detection (HPLC-CAD) was used to characterise 6’-SL sodium salt in eight batches of the novel food – five batches manufactured using soy peptone in the fermentation media and three batches manufactured without soy peptone in the fermentation media.

2.2. Production Process

The production microorganism, E. coli NEO6, used to manufacture the novel food is a genetically modified derivative of E. coli W (Waksman’s strain) that functions as a processing aid as defined in Article 3(2)(b) of assimilated Regulation (EC) No.1333/2008 on food additives. A novel food produced by a GMO does not fall under the remit of the GMO legislation, assimilated Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 or assimilated Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, when the production microorganism is removed during the manufacturing process and therefore no recombinant DNA remains. This has been confirmed in the compositional analysis as detailed below.

The novel food is classified as category 1 under the EFSA GMO guidance: chemically defined purified compounds and their mixtures in which both genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs) and newly introduced genes have been removed, under EFSA guidance, which categorises GMMs and their products for risk assessment purposes (FSA GMO Panel, 2011), which the FSA have retained for the purposes of technical review.

Although E. coli is not considered to be suitable for qualified presumption of safety (QPS) status (EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, 2023), E. coli W is widely used for biotechnological applications. Genomic analysis confirms that the genes required for pathogenicity are missing key components or they have been mutationally inactivated (Archer et al., 2011). Furthermore, E. coli W is considered to be a safe and non-pathogenic microorganism because this does not cause disease in healthy adult humans or colonise the human gut (Bauer et al., 2008; NIH, 2019). On the basis of this information, the new production strain organism does not introduce any new risks that need to be evaluated and managed.

The absence of bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family (ISO 21528-1:2017) and residual bacterial DNA (LOQ = 4 µg/kg) confirms the genetically modified E. coli NEO6 is not present in the novel food.

The first stage of the production process involves the conversion of D-lactose and D-glucose to 6’-SL by the adapted cellular metabolism of the production microorganism (The commercial production process does not use soy peptone). Glucose acts as an exclusive energy and carbon source, and lactose as a substrate for the biosynthesis of 6’-SL. The 6’-SL is released from the E. coli NEO6 into the fermentation broth. The production microorganism, E. coli NEO6, is removed from the culture medium by microfiltration at the end of the fermentation process.

The second stage of the production process involves a series of purification and isolation steps (filtration, ion exchange, concentration and spray drying) to the obtain the final purified novel food in powder form.

Information on the acceptance criteria for the raw materials and processing aids was provided. The purity criteria for the reagents used in the manufacture of 6’-SL sodium salt are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.Purity criteria for reagents used to synthesize the novel food
Raw material Purity
Glucose (powdered) ≥ 89% (dextrose equivalent)
Glucose (liquid) ≥ 96% (dextrose equivalent)
D-Lactose Optical rotation [α] 20D +54.4 to +55.9°

The novel food is produced in line with Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles. The manufacturing facility is FSSC (Food Safety System Certification) 22000 certified.

Bacterial contamination of the novel food is controlled by monitoring the purification steps and the membrane filtration step prior to spray drying. To prevent bacterial growth, the water content in the finished product is monitored and specified at ≤ 10.5% w/w. Endotoxin levels in the novel food are controlled by ultrafiltration and compliance with the specified level at ≤ 10 EU/mg.

The production process has characterised the potential hazards and the corresponding control measures are appropriate.

2.3. Compositional information

Results from five independent batches of 6’-SL sodium salt manufactured using fermentation media containing soy peptone and three independent batches of 6’-SL sodium salt manufactured using fermentation media without soy peptone demonstrated that the novel food is appropriately characterised (Table 2).

Table 2.Compositional Analysis of the novel food produced with and without soy peptone in fermentation media
Test Parameter Batch 1 Batch 2 Batch 3 Batch 4 Batch 5 Batch 6 Batch 7 Batch 8
6’-SL sodium salt (% w/w DM) 87 92 90 92 92 91 93 95
Sialic acid (% w/w DM) 5.1 3.5 4.9 4.3 5.4 1.8 0.1 0.2
D-glucose (% w/w DM) ND ND ND ND ND < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
D-lactose (% w/w DM) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
6’-sialyllactulose
(% w/w DM)
0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 ----- ----- -----
3’-SL sodium salt
(% w/w DM)
ND ND ND ND ND ----- ----- -----
Sum of 6’-sialyllactulose and 3’-SL sodium salts (% w/w DM) ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.7 0.5 0.3
Sum of other carbohydrates (% w/w DM) 6.6 3.3 3.8 2.5 1.4 5.0 5.8 3.8
Water (%) 5.3 5.0 5.4 5.6 5.0 7.9 8.4 8.6
Residual Protein (mg/kg) ----- ----- ≤ 100 ----- ----- ≤ 100 ≤ 100 ≤ 100
Sodium (% w/w DM) 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.6
pH (5% solution, 25oC) 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.1 5.9 5.8
Arsenic (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.03
Cadmium (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Lead (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.02 0.03 < 0.02
Mercury (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.004 < 0.004 < 0.004
Aflatoxin M1 (µg/kg) ----- < 0.02 < 0.02 ----- ----- < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02
Total plate count (CFU/g) < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10
Yeast and mould (CFU/g) < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 10 < 10 < 10
Enterobacteriaceae (in 10g) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Salmonella (in 25g) ----- ----- ND ----- ----- ND ND ND
Cronobacter spp. (in 10g) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Listeria monocytogenes
(in 25g)
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Presumptive Bacillus cereus (CFU/g) < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10
Residual Endotoxins (EU/mg) 0.006 0.011 0.020 0.034 0.026 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 < 0.0002

Batches 1 – 5 manufactured with soy peptone in fermentation media; batches 6 – 8 manufactured without soy peptone in fermentation media. SL = sialyllactose; DM = dry matter; ND = not detected; ---- = not determined; CFU = colony forming units; EU/mg = endotoxin units/mg
For batches 1 -5, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) respectively: sialic acid, 6’-sialyllactulose and 3’-SL sodium salts are 0.03% w/w DM and 0.2% w/w DM (as 6’-SL sodium salt); D-glucose and D-lactose is 0.02% w/w DM, and 0.05% w/w DM (as D-lactose). For batches 6 – 8, LOD and LOQ respectively: sialic acid = 0.15% w/w DM and 0.45% w/w DM (as sialic acid); 6’-sialyllactulose + 3’-SL sodium salts are = 0.13% w/w DM and 0.18% w/w DM (as 6’-SL sodium salt); D-glucose and D-lactose is 0.05% w/w DM.
Sum of other carbohydrates (w/w DM) = 100 – [6’-SL (acid) + quantified carbohydrates (i.e., sialic acid, D-glucose, D-lactose, 6’-sialyllactulose (acid) and 3’-SL (acid) + sodium]
LOQ for sodium = 1.25% (ICP-MS) for batches 1 – 5 and LOQ for sodium = 0.005% (ICP-OES) for batches 6 – 8; Protein test limit = 100 mg/kg; LOQ for heavy metals = 0.05 mg/kg for batches 1 – 5 and LOD and LOQ for As and Cd = 0.01 mg/kg and 0.03 mg/kg; LOD and LOQ for Pb = 0.02 mg/kg and 0.03 mg/kg; LOQ for Hg = 0.004 mg/kg and 0.01 mg/kg for batches 6 – 8; LOD for Aerobic plate count = 10 CFU/g; LOD for yeast and mould = 100 CFU/g (surface plating) for batches 1 – 5 and LOD for yeast and mould = < 10 CFU/g (in-depth plating) for batches 6 -8; LOD for Presumptive Bacillus cereus = 10 CFU/g; LOQ for endotoxins = 0.0001563 EU/mg (rounded up to 0.0002 EU/mg).

The composition data demonstrates that the novel food is consistently the same when the manufactured with or without soya peptone in the fermentation media.

Sialic acid, glucose, lactose, 6’-sialyllacultose, and 3’-SL sodium salt are naturally occurring components of human milk. Glucose is a breakdown product of the naturally occurring milk sugar lactose and 6’-sialyllactulose, is an isomerisation product of 6’-SL sodium salt, formed when the terminal glucose moiety isomerizes into fructose (EFSA NDA Panel, 2020).

An assessment was conducted in accordance with the EFSA Guidance on technical requirements for regulated food and feed product applications to establish the presence of small particles including nanoparticles in the novel food (EFSA, 2021). A solubility in water test was conducted in two batches of the novel food produced with soy peptone and three batches without soy peptone in the fermentation media. The results confirmed that the novel food exceeded the decision criteria for solubility (> 33.3 g/L) as described in the guidance. Therefore, further evaluation for the presence of nanoparticles in the novel food is not required.

Certification was provided to demonstrate that the contract laboratories were accredited to perform these analytical studies. Where in-house analysis was utilised, full methodology and supporting validation documentation was provided.

The data presented indicate the novel food and any hazards present were appropriately characterised.

2.4. Stability

Results from an ongoing 36-month real-time stability study (25 ± 2°C; 60 ± 5% Relative Humidity) on a single batch of novel food produced with soy peptone in the fermentation media was provided. Data covering 24 months was reported. Testing for, carbohydrate, water content, physicochemical parameters, and water activity was undertaken at the 6- and 12-month time-points. These endpoints in addition to microbiology quality were assessed at 24 months. No significant changes were observed, and microbial parameters were below the limits of detection.

A 6-month accelerated stability study (40 ± 2°C; 75 ± 5% Relative Humidity) was conducted on five batches of novel food produced with soy peptone in the fermentation media. Data for the following parameters was provided: 6’-SL sodium salt, carbohydrate, sodium, water content, and physicochemical parameters and water activity. No significant changes were observed.

No stability data was provided for the novel food in different food matrices.

The presence of soy peptone in the fermentation media is not expected to have a significant impact on the composition of the novel food. On this basis, the data provided supports the stability of the novel food, manufactured with or without soy peptone in the fermentation media, for up to 24 months.

2.5. Specification

The specification parameters for the novel food (Table 3) were assessed using internationally recognised methods or are otherwise determined using internally developed and validated methods.

Table 3.Specification for the novel food
Parameter Specification Method
6’-SL sodium salt ≥ 82.0 % w/w DM HPLC-CAD (in-house)
Sialic acid ≤ 6.0 % w/w DM HPLC-CAD (in-house)
D-glucose ≤ 3.0 % w/w DM HPLC-PAD (in-house)
D-lactose ≤ 3.0 % w/w DM HPLC-PAD (in-house)
Sum of 6’-sialyllactulose and 3’-SL sodium salts ≤ 5.0 % w/w DM HPLC-CAD (in-house)
Sum of other carbohydrates ≤ 13.0 % w/w DM Calculation
Water ≤ 10.5 % w/w JP 2.48
Residual Protein ≤ 0.01 % w/w Bradford assay
Sodium ≤ 5.0 % w/w DM USP <233>
pH (5% solution, 25oC) 4.5 – 7.5 JP 2.54
Arsenic ≤ 0.2 mg/kg USP <233> or AOAC method
Aflatoxin M1 ≤ 0.025 µg/kg AOAC 2000.08
Total plate count ≤ 1,000 CFU/g ISO 4833-1:2013
Yeast and mould ≤ 100 CFU/g ISO 21527-2:2008
Enterobacteriaceae Absent in 10g ISO 21528-1:2017
Salmonella spp. Absent in 25g ISO 6579-1:2017
Cronobacter spp. Absent in 10g ISO 22964:2017
Listeria monocytogenes Absent in 25g ISO 11290-1:2017
Presumptive Bacillus cereus ≤ 50 CFU/g ISO 7932:2004
Residual Endotoxins ≤ 10 EU/mg JP 4.01

DM = dry matter; CFU = colony forming units; HPLC-CAD = high-performance liquid chromatography – charged aerosol detection; HPLC-PAD = high-performance liquid chromatography – pulsed amperometric detection; JP = Japanese Pharmacopoeia; USP = United States Pharmacopoeia; EPA = Environmental Protection Agency; ICP-MS = Inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry; ICP-OES = Inductively coupled plasma – optical emission spectroscopy; AOAC = Association of Official Analytical Chemists; ISO = International Organisation for Standardisation
6’-sialyllactulose and 3’-SL sodium salts peaks on the HPLC-CAD chromatograms overlap.
Sum of other carbohydrates (w/w DM) = 100 – [6’-SL (acid) + quantified carbohydrates (i.e., sialic acid, D-glucose, D-lactose, 6’-sialyllactulose (acid) and 3’-SL (acid) + sodium]
Hg – EPA (2007) 7473

The information provided is sufficient for the specification of the novel food, and appropriately characterises the novel food seeking authorisation.

2.6. History of Use

There is no history of use for the novel food in the UK.

6’-SL sodium salt, which is a major constituent of the novel food, has been authorised in EU (assimilated Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/82 and assimilated Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/948) for use in a range of foods and food supplements. The authorised 6’-SL sodium salt is produced by fermentation using a genetically modified strains of E. coli K-12 DH1 and E. coli BL21 (DE3), respectively.

6’-SL has been detected in bovine milk ranging from range from 4 to 10 mg/L and up to 100 mg/L in bovine colostrum (Albrecht et al., 2014; Aldredge et al., 2013; Urashima et al., 2013).

Human breast milk contains a family of structurally related oligosaccharides, known as human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), as the third largest solid components (Bode, 2012; Kunz & Rudloff, 1993; Newburg, 2013). The concentrations of HMOs in human colostrum are 20 to 25 g/L, whereas in mature human milk, the concentrations are 5 to 20 g/L (Bode, 2012; Thurl et al., 2010; Urashima et al., 2018).

6’-SL belongs to the subfraction of ‘acidic’ HMOs, which is characterised by the presence of sialic acids, and the whole subfraction accounts for 1.5 – 3.3 g/L (Bode, 2012; Rijnierse et al., 2011; Thurl et al., 2010). 6’-SL is the predominant acidic HMO and one of the most abundant HMOs along with 2’-FL (2’-fucosyllactose), lacto-N-fucopentaose I, LNT (lacto-N-tetraose) and LNnT (lacto-N-neotetraose).

There are two naturally occurring sialyllactoses, which are constitutional isomers. 3’-SL is sialylated by α-(2"-3’) linkage and 6’-SL is sialylated by α-(2"-6’) linkage. 6’-SL is the predominant acidic HMO in human milk; however, both forms are reported to have similar functions and biological roles (Tarr et al., 2015).

Thurl et al. (2017) summarised the findings from twenty-one published studies and reported that the content of 6’-SL in milk from mothers who delivered at term ranged from 0.38 to 0.91 g/L (average 0.64 g/L). For mothers who delivered preterm, 6’-SL ranged from 0.25 to 1.08 g/L (average 0.66 g/L). More recently, Soyyılmaz et al. (2021) reported that the mean of mean concentrations for mature and transitional milk were 0.40 g/L and 0.71 g/L respectively. The maximum means were 0.74 and 1.30 g/L, respectively.

Using the reported levels of 6’-SL in human breast milk from Thurl et al. (2017) and considering the average and high daily intake of breast milk (800 mL and 1,200 mL, respectively) for infants from 0 to 6 months (EFSA NDA Panel, 2013), the daily intake levels of 6’-SL from human milk for a 6.7 kg body weight infant (EFSA SC, 2012) are shown in Table 4.

Table 4.Estimated Intakes of 6’-SL from 800ml and 1200ml of Breast milk for 6.7kg Infant a using data from Thurl et al. (2017)
Mean intake levels
(mg/kg BW/day)
95th percentile intake levels
(mg/kg BW/day)
Estimated highest intake for 800ml milk * 79 129
Estimated highest intake for 1200ml milk * 118 193

The same approach, but using data from Soyyılmaz et al. (2021), results in lower intakes for 6’-SL, up to 133 mg/kg BW/day (EFSA NDA Panel, 2022).

The history of use does not indicate any further areas for evaluation.

2.7. Proposed Use and Intake

The target population is the general population.

The intended uses and use levels of the 6’-SL sodium salt from the novel food are listed in Table 5. These food categories and intended use levels are the same as those assessed by EFSA for 6’-SL produced by fermentation with a genetically modified strain of E. coli K-12 DH1 (EFSA NDA, 2020).

Table 5.Food Categories and Use Levels for 6’-SL from the novel food
Food Category Name Proposed Maximum Use Level
Unflavoured pasteurised and unflavoured sterilised (including UHT) milk products 0.5 g/L
Unflavoured fermented milk-based products 0.5 g/L beverages
2.5 g/kg for products other than beverages
Flavoured fermented milk-based products including heat-treated products 0.5 g/L beverages
5 g/kg for products other than beverages
Fine bakery wares. Cereal bars only 5.0 g/kg
Infant formula as defined in assimilated Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 0.4 g/L in the final product ready for use, marketed as such or reconstituted as instructed by the manufacturer
Follow-on formula as defined in assimilated Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 0.3 g/L in the final product ready for use, marketed as such or reconstituted as instructed by the manufacturer
Processed cereal-based food and baby food for infants and young children as defined in assimilated Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 0.3 g/L in the final product ready for use, marketed as such or reconstituted as instructed by the manufacturer
2.5 g/kg for products other than beverages
Milk-based drinks and similar products intended for young children 0.3 g/L (beverages) in the final product ready for use, marketed as such or reconstituted as instructed by the manufacturer
2.5 g/kg for products other than beverages
Foods for special medical purposes as defined in assimilated Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 In accordance with the particular nutritional requirements of the persons for whom the products are intended
Total diet replacement for weight control as defined in assimilated Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 1.0 g/L beverages (equivalent to 0.25 g/meal based on a standard 250 g/meal replacement beverage)
10 g/kg for products other than beverages (equivalent to 0.30 g/meal based on a standard 30 g meal replacement bar)
Flavoured drinks (excluding cola-flavour and cola-flavoured drinks) 0.5 g/L
Food supplements * 1.0 g/day for the general population; 0.3 g/day for young children; 0.4 g/day for infants

* Food Supplements as defined in the Food Supplements (England) Regulations 2003, the Food Supplements (Wales) Regulations 2003 and the Food Supplements (Scotland) Regulations 2003

The anticipated intake for 6’-SL sodium salt in children up to the age of 16 weeks is estimated to be 104 mg/kg body weight/day for a 6.7 kg infant. This value was calculated from the use of 6’-SL in infant formula (0.4 g/L) at a high consumption level of 260 ml/kg body weight/day, as established by the EFSA Scientific Committee (EFSA SC, 2017). This value does not exceed the estimated high daily intake of 6’-SL in breast-fed infants per kg/BW (see Table 4).

An intake assessment using the summary statistics of consumption from the dietary surveys in the EFSA Comprehensive database was conducted by matching the intended conditions of use with the FoodEx2 categories. The estimated mean and high-level intakes of 6’-SL sodium salt from the proposed conditions of use for each sub-population are presented in Table 6.

Table 6.Estimated daily intake for 6’-SL sodium salt from the current authorised uses in the List of Novel Foods (assimilated Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470).
Population Group Mean Intakes of 6’-SL sodium salt (mg/kg BW/day) 95th percentile intakes of 6’-SL sodium salt (mg/kg BW/day)
Infants (≤ 11 months) 16 – 74 38 – 192
Young children (12 to 35 months) 15 – 46 39 – 147
Other children (3 to 9 years) 6 – 25 16 – 61
Adolescents (10 to 17 years) 3 – 8 7 – 19
Adults (18 to 64 years) 1 – 5 5 – 13
Pregnant women 1 – 5 4 – 11
Lactating women 4 – 5 10 – 11
Elderly (> 65 years) 1 – 4 5 – 10

The highest estimated 95th percentile intake for 6’-SL sodium salt from the novel food was reported in the infant sub-population at 192 mg/kg BW/day. By comparison, the highest estimated intake for 6’-SL from human breast milk consumption is 193 mg/kg BW/day in infants (Table 4).

The use level for 6’-SL sodium salt in food supplements is 0.4 g/day for infants, 0.3 g/day for young children, and 1 g/day for all other population sub-groups. Food supplements are not intended to be used if other foods with the novel food are consumed on the same day. For infants and young children, food supplements are not intended to be used if breast milk or other foods with added 6’-SL sodium salt are consumed on the same day.

On a body weight basis, the maximum intake of 6’-SL sodium salt in food supplements for infants (0.4 g/day) and young children (0.3 g/day) would be 60 mg/kg BW/day and 25 mg/kg BW/day, respectively. For all other sub-populations, the maximum daily intake would range from 14 to 43 mg/kg BW/day based on default body weight (EFSA SC, 2012). On this basis, consumption of 6’-SL sodium salt in food supplements is not expected to exceed the levels found in human breast milk.

Certain food categories for 6’-SL sodium salt are currently authorised (Assimilated Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/948) at higher use levels than those listed in Table 5. Therefore, an assessment of the combined intake of authorised and intended food categories was conducted. The estimated combined mean and 95th percentile intakes for each sub-population are presented in Table 7.

Table 7.Estimated daily intake for 6’-SL sodium salt from the current authorised uses and intended uses
Population Group Mean Intakes of 6’-SL sodium salt
(mg/kg BW/day)
95th percentile intakes of 6’-SL sodium salt
(mg/kg BW/day)
Infants (≤ 11 months) 23 – 95 66 – 206
Young children (12 to 35 months) 11 – 47 29 – 159
Other children (3 to 9 years) 4.1 – 15 9.5 – 26
Adolescents (10 to 17 years) 0.7 – 5.8 3.0 – 13
Adults (18+ years) 2.3 – 3.0 5.2 – 7.9

The highest combined estimated 95th percentile daily intake is reported in infants at 206 mg/kg BW/day. This is higher than the estimated highest concentration of 6’-SL sodium salt from the daily intake of human milk of 193 mg/kg BW/day (Table 4). The estimated 95th percentile intake levels for all other sub-population groups are not expected to exceed this value.

2.8. Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion (ADME)

No ADME studies were conducted on the novel food.

6’-SL does not undergo any significant digestion by human enzymes in the upper gastrointestinal tract and only small amounts are expected to be absorbed (EFSA NDA Panel, 2020). HMOs are fermented in the colon by intestinal microbiota with a fraction excreted unchanged in the faeces and a small fraction found in the urine (EFSA NDA Panel, 2022). There is no information which indicates that 6’-SL in the novel food differs from the 6’-SL in human breast milk (EFSA NDA Panel, 2023).

The ADME of human milk oligosaccharides are well understood and the information does not indicate any further areas of concern.

2.9. Nutritional Information

The novel food is mainly composed of the oligosaccharide, 6’-SL as a sodium salt, which is structurally identical to the naturally occurring counterpart in human breast milk.

The novel food contains 6’-SL sodium salt which may contribute to the daily intake of sodium in consumers. The EFSA NDA Panel has provided advice on the levels of sodium that are considered adequate and safe (EFSA NDA Panel, 2019).

The estimated highest intakes of sodium from 6’-SL consumption are shown in Table 8.

Table 8.Estimated highest daily intakes of sodium in all sub-populations from intended uses of 6’-SL sodium salt
Population Group * Highest 95th percentile intakes of 6’-SL sodium salt (mg/day) Replace with Highest estimated intake of sodium from 6’-SL sodium salt **(mg/day) EFSA adequate and safe intakes levels for sodium
(mg/day)
Children
(≤ 16w)
520 26 Not established
Infants
(≤ 11m)
960 48 120 (≤ 6m)
200 (7 – 11m)
Young children
(12 – 35m)
1,764 88 1100
Other children
(3 – 9y)
1,403 70 1300 (4 – 6y)
1700 (7 – 10y)
Adolescents
(10 – 17y)
817 (10 – 14 y)
1,159 (15 – 17y)
41
58
2000 (> 11y)
Adults
(> 18y)
910 46 2000

w = weeks; m = months; y = years
* EFSA SC, 2012
** based on highest specified limit for sodium of 5% w/w in novel food (see Table 3)

Consumption of the novel food at the proposed use levels is not expected to be nutritionally disadvantageous for consumers.

2.10. Toxicological Information

Toxicological studies were performed with 6’-SL sodium salt to support the safety assessment of the novel food. The respective study reports are unpublished and claimed as proprietary data. They were reviewed by the ACNFP and considered essential in the assessment of the safety of the novel food.

2.10.1. Genotoxicity

In vitro genotoxicity testing of 6’-SL sodium salt was conducted under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) conditions and according to the OECD guidelines: in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG 471) and in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test (OECD TG 474). This is not the approach recommended by the UK Committee on Mutagenicity or in the guidance on the preparation and submission of an application for authorisation of a novel food in the context of assimilated Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.

The Scientific opinion on genotoxicity testing strategies applicable to food and feed safety assessment (EFSA, 2011) recommends two in vitro tests as the first step in testing for genotoxicity: in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG 471) and in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test (OECD TG 487). This approach addresses the key endpoints for adequately assessing genotoxicity with the minimum number of tests and avoiding unnecessary animal tests.

The in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test (OECD TG 474) assesses both structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations and is an appropriate follow-up test for in vitro clastogens and aneugens.

The in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test (Oguma, 2020 [unpublished]) demonstrated that 6’-SL sodium salt is non-mutagenic at concentrations up to 5,000 µg 6’-SL/plate, in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.

The in vivo mammalian micronucleus test (Kikuchi, 2020 [unpublished]) reported that that 6’-SL sodium salt is non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic. However, no evidence was provided to demonstrate that the bone marrow in mice had been exposed to 6’-SL. Therefore, an in vitro micronucleus test was conducted.

The in vitro micronucleus test (Kikuchi, 2022 [unpublished]) demonstrated that 6’-SL sodium salt is non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic in the absence or presence of metabolic activation up to the highest concentration of 2,000 µg 6’-SL/ml.

The results from these in vitro and in vivo studies support the conclusion that 6’-SL sodium salt is not genotoxic.

2.10.2. Sub-chronic toxicity

A Repeated Dose 90-day oral gavage study in rodents (Tsuboi, 2021 [unpublished]) was conducted under GLP conditions according to OECD TG 408 guidelines as recommended by the Guidance on the preparation and submission of an application for authorisation of a novel food in the context of assimilated Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. The aim of the study was to identify any adverse effects following the consumption of 6’-SL sodium salt.

In this 90-day oral gavage study, each group consisted of 10 female and 10 male Sprague Dawley rats which were dosed with 0 (control – vehicle only [water]), 542, 1,084 or 2,168 mg/kg BW/day of 6’-SL sodium salt by oral gavage.

No deaths, test item-related clinical abnormalities, ocular changes, or differences in food consumption and bodyweight between test groups were reported. Statistically significant changes in haematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, and organ weights were reported. However, these were not dose dependent and the applicant has confirmed these were within the historical control range for the facility and therefore not of concern.

No dose related abnormalities were noted during the necropsy or histopathological evaluation. Therefore, the no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) for 6’-SL sodium salt was considered to be the highest dose tested of 2,168 mg/kg BW/day.

2.10.3. Human studies

No human clinical trials were conducted with the novel food.

2.11. Allergenicity

The protein content of the novel food is reported as < 0.01% w/w.

Absence of bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family (ISO 21528-1:2017) confirmed that the genetically modified E. coli NEO6 is not present in the novel food.

The potential allergenicity of the introduced proteins expressed in E. coli W was assessed using the National Institute of Health Sciences (Japan) Allergen Database for Food Safety and conducted in line with FAO (2001) guidelines. None of the proteins was predicted to be an allergen.

ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) tests were conducted on the novel food manufactured using soy peptone to detect the presence of milk proteins (LOQ = 1 µg/g). The results confirmed that milk proteins were effectively removed during the purification process and were not present in the finished powder.

Five batches of the novel food manufactured using soy peptone were also tested for the presence of soybean protein. The results from the ELISA test (LOQ = 1 µg/g) confirmed that soybean protein was effectively removed from all batches of the novel food during the purification process and was not present in the finished powder.

The likelihood of allergenic reactions to the novel food is expected to be low under the proposed conditions of use.

3. Discussion

The novel food is a white to off-white powder which is mainly composed of the human identical milk trisaccharide, 6’-SL as a sodium salt (≥ 82.0% w/w DM), as well as other saccharides in smaller quantities.

The novel food is manufactured by microbial fermentation using a genetically modified strain of Escherichia coli W and then refined to yield the purified powder.

6’-SL sodium salt is intended to be used in dairy products and analogues, bakery wares, foods for special groups, beverages, and food supplements. The general population are identified as the target population of the novel food.

Analysis confirms that the 6’-SL sodium salt is structurally identical to the 6’-SL found naturally in human milk. Exposure to 6’-SL relates solely to breastfeeding infants as there is no recognised history of use for this milk oligosaccharide as an ingredient in foods or food supplements.

In the Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, the NOAEL for 6’-SL sodium salt was 2,168 mg/kg BW/day, the highest dose tested. When this NOAEL is compared with the highest estimated exposure in each population category, the margins of exposure range from 11 to 217. Given that the 6’-SL sodium salt in the novel food is equivalent to 6’-SL found in human breast milk, these margins of exposure are acceptable with respect to the highest estimated daily intakes in the intended population.

For most sub-populations, the combined daily intake of the 6’-SL sodium salt is not expected to exceed the highest estimated intake level of 193 mg/kg BW/day for 6’-SL in breastfed infants. In the infant sub-population, the highest combined estimated intake of 6’-SL sodium salt is reported as 206 mg/kg BW/day, which exceeds this value. However, given the wide range of estimated intakes for 6’-SL sodium salt (66 – 206 mg/kg BW/day), the limited absorption of HMOs, and the absence of toxicological effects reported in the in vivo 90-day oral gavage study, this is not considered to be a concern.

The use level of 6’-SL sodium salt in food supplements (0.4 g/day for infants, 0.3 g/day for young children and 1.0 g/day for all other sub-populations) is not expected to exceed the highest intake level of 6’-SL in breastfed infants on a body weight basis. Food supplements are not intended to be used by the general population if other foods containing the novel food, including breast milk or other foods for infants and young children, are consumed on the same day.

4. Conclusions

The FSA and FSS have undertaken the assessment of the novel food, which is composed mainly of 6’-SL sodium salt and concluded that the novel food is safe under the proposed conditions of use and does not pose a safety risk to human health. The anticipated intake level and the proposed use in food and food supplements was not considered to be nutritionally disadvantageous.

The advice was based on the information in the novel food dossier submitted by the applicant plus the supplementary information and could not have been reached without the following data claimed as proprietary by the applicant:

  • annexes to the dossier which relate to the identity of the novel food, the production process, composition, stability, and the solubility of the novel food

  • in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test (Oguma, 2020 [unpublished]); in vitro micronucleus test (Kikuchi, 2022 [unpublished]); 90-day repeat dose feeding study with the novel food (Tsuboi, 2021 [unpublished])


Abbreviations

Acronym Definition
6’-SL 6’-sialyllactose
ACNFP Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes
ADME Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion
AOCS Association of Official Analytical Chemists
BW body weight
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
CFU Colony Forming Unit
COSY Correlation spectroscopy
DM Dry matter
EC European Commission
EFSA European Food Safety Agency
ELISA Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EU European Union
FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation
FDA Food and Drug Administration
GLP Good Laboratory Practice
GMM Genetically Modified Microorganism
HACCP Hazards Analysis and Critical Control Points
HETCOR Heteronuclear correlation
HMBC Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation
HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography
ICP-MS Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
ICP-OES Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy
ISO International Organisation for Standardization
IUPAC International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
JP Japanese Pharmacopoeia
LOD Limit of detection
LOQ Limit of quantification
NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
NOAEL No Observable Adverse Effect Level
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PAD Pulsed Amperometric Detection
QPS Qualified Presumption of Safety
TOCSY Total correlation spectroscopy
USP United States Pharmacopoeia

Acknowledgements

The members of the ACNFP during the course of the assessment who were;

Dr Camilla Alexander White, Dr Anton Alldrick, Dr Kimon Andreas Karatzas, Ms Alison Austin, Professor George Bassel, Dr Mark Berry, Dr Christine Bosch, Professor Dimitris Charalampopoulos, Dr Catharina Edwards, Professor Susan Fairweather-Tait, Professor Paul Frazer, Dr Hamid Ghoddusi, Professor Andy Greenfield, Professor Wendy Harwood, Professor Huw D. Jones, Dr Ray Kemp, Dr Elizabeth Lund,  Professor Harry J. McArdle, Mrs Rebecca McKenzie,  Professor Clare Mills, Dr Antonio Peña-Fernández, Dr Lesley Stanley, Professor Hans Verhagen, Dr Maureen Wakefield, and Professor Bruce Whitelaw.

Article updated on 15th October 2024