1. Introduction

AMR microorganisms are increasingly being recognised as a global problem. Whilst it is a natural process, the extensive use of antimicrobials in humans and animals has been a significant driving force in its development. Antimicrobials are used in the livestock industry to prevent and control bacterial disease. The use of subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics in animal feed (as growth promotors) since the 1950’s has caused an expansion of the pool of AMR bacteria. In 2006 the use of these was banned in the EU and the UK (WHO, 2023).

E. coli is a normal inhabitant of the mammalian gut (termed a commensal) and most isolates do not cause observable clinical disease in healthy animals or humans (WHO, 2018). However, commensal bacteria can be AMR gene reservoirs. Horizontal gene transfer among bacteria allows them to exchange their genetic material, including antibiotic resistance genes. E. coli isolates are therefore useful ‘indicators’ of AMR. They are ubiquitous in animals and they allow us to monitor the presence of AMR typically circulating in food producing animals. If bacteria possess a resistance to three or more different classes of antibiotics, they are called multidrug resistant (MDR). MDR bacteria pose a health risk because fewer therapeutic agents are active against them. This is a particular concern if the MDR includes resistance to certain classes of antibiotics (such as the carbapenems), which are used to treat severe bacterial infections when other treatment options are ineffective (WHO, 2017).

One of the main objectives within the FSA’s Strategy for 2022-2027 is to ensure that ‘food is safe’. Addressing the public health threat posed by AMR is a national strategic priority for the UK and led to the Government publishing both a 20-year vision of AMR and a 5-year (2024-2029) AMR National Action Plan (NAP). This survey will provide continued monitoring for E. coli from retail meats and fits into the Northern Ireland AMR Action Plan, which aims to promote relevant research and to ensure that policy and practice are informed by this. The continued surveillance of AMR bacteria in humans, environments and food producing animals is crucial to monitor and understand if these meats pose a risk to animal public health, in relation to AMR and will allow future monitoring of trends over time. The FSA is responsible for the monitoring and reporting to the European Union (EU) of AMR from fresh meats at retail sale in Northern Ireland (NI) under (EU) 2020/1729 and Article 9(1) of Directive 2003/99/EC.

2. Material and methods

The FSA commissioned an AMR survey in beef and pork in 2023, 2025 and 2027 and chicken and turkey meats in 2024 and 2026 collected at retail sale in NI under (EU) 2020/1729. The sampling methodology and analytical methods met EU specifications to enable data comparability.

This survey collected 96 pork and 98 beef fresh meat samples on retail sale in NI from September to December 2023. The prevalence of commensal E. coli was tested from all 194 retail meat samples. Selective agars and biochemical testing were used to confirm the identity of all bacterial isolates as E. coli. Analysis involved the initial isolation and enrichment of E. coli from all meat samples, prior to testing for the production of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-Lactamases (AmpC) and Carbapenemases (CP) enzymes. The AMR phenotype was determined using a standard microbroth dilution method with European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) thresholds for resistance and concentration ranges for (up to 25) antimicrobial substances according to EU decision (EU) 2020/1729. Five confirmed AMR resistant E. coli isolates had Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) performed on them, including In-silicon Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and AMR analyses using draft genome assemblies according to EU guidelines. All genes and plasmids of AMR and virulence interest had at least 95% identity. All DNA sequences were uploaded to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) browser: PRJEB72200.

Tables 1-3

Table 1.Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) resistance genes and AMR phenotype with National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Accession numbers from the five Escherichia coli isolates from 194 fresh retail beef and pork samples from Northern Ireland in 2023. The study number isolate identity (ID), Multi-locus sequence Type Identity (MLST ID) and MLST lineage are also included.
Isolate ID MSLT ID MLST Lineage AMR resistance gene AMR phenotype NCBI Accession Number
RM-NI-131-CTX-23 23 B1 aadA1 Spectinomycin, Streptomycin JX185132
aadA1 Spectinomycin, Streptomycin JQ414041
blaCTX-M-1 Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Aztreonam, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin DQ915955
sul1 Sulfamethoxazole U12338
tet(A) Doxycycline, Tetracycline AJ517790
RM-NI-159-CTX-23 4981 A aadA1 Spectinomycin, Streptomycin JQ414041
aadA2b Spectinomycin, Streptomycin D43625
aph(6)-Id Streptomycin M28829
aph(3'')-Ib Streptomycin AF321551
aadA5 Spectinomycin, Streptomycin AF137361
aph(3')-Ia Kanamycin, Neomycin, Neomycin, Kanamycin, Lividomycin, Paromomycin, Ribostamycin, Unknown Aminoglycoside, Kanamycin V00359
blaCTX-M-15 Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Aztreonam, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin AY044436
blaTEM-1B Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Cephalothin, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin AY458016
cmlA1 Chloramphenicol M64556
sul3 Sulfamethoxazole AJ459418
sul2 Sulfamethoxazole HQ840942
tet(B) Doxycycline, Tetracycline, Minocycline AF326777
dfrA17 Trimethoprim FJ460238
RM-NI-181-CTX-23 2179 AxB1 aph(6)-Id Streptomycin M28829
aph(3'')-Ib Streptomycin AF321551
blaTEM-1B Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Cephalothin, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin AY458016
blaCTX-M-65 Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Aztreonam, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin EF418608
floR Chloramphenicol, Florfenicol AF118107
qnrS2 Ciprofloxacin DQ485530
sul2 Sulfamethoxazole AY034138
tet(A) Doxycycline, Tetracycline AF534183
RM-NI-058-CTX-23 69 D aph(6)-Id Streptomycin M28829
aph(3'')-Ib Streptomycin AF321551
blaCTX-M-15 Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Aztreonam, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin AY044436
blaTEM-1B Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Cephalothin, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin AY458016
qnrS1 Ciprofloxacin AB187515
sul2 Sulfamethoxazole AY034138
tet(A) Doxycycline, Tetracycline AJ517790
aph(6)-Id Streptomycin M28829
RM-NI-094-CTX-23: 328 None dfrA14 Trimethoprim KF921535
aadA17 Spectinomycin, Streptomycin FJ460181
blaTEM-52B Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Aztreonam, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin AF027199
lnu(F) Lincomycin EU118119
Table 2.Identified Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) plasmids with National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Accession numbers present in the five Escherichia coli isolates isolated from 194 fresh retail beef and pork samples from Northern Ireland in 2023. The study number isolate identity (ID) and isolate Multi-locus sequence Type Identity (MLST ID) are also included.
Isolate ID MLST ID Plasmid NCBI Accession Number
RM-NI-131-CTX-23 23 Col(MG828) NC008486
IncFIB(AP001918) AP001918
IncFIC(FII) AP001918
IncFII AY458016
IncI1-I(Alpha) AP005147
IncX1 EU370913
IncX4 CP002895
RM-NI-159-CTX-23 4981 Col(pHAD28) KU674895
Col8282 DQ995352
IncFIB(AP001918) AP001918
IncFII(pAMA1167-NDM-5) CP024805
IncQ1 M28829
p0111 AP010962
RM-NI-181-CTX-23 2179 IncFIB(AP001918) AP001918
IncFIC(FII) AP001918
RM-NI-058-CTX-23 69 IncY K02380
RM-NI-094-CTX-23 328 Col(MG828) NC008486
IncFII(29) CP003035
IncX1 EU370913
Table 3.Virulence, acid, and metal genes from the five Escherichia coli isolates from 194 fresh retail beef and pork samples from Northern Ireland in 2023. The study number isolate identity (ID), Multi-locus sequence Type Identity (MLST ID) and MLST lineage are also included.
Isolate ID MSLT ID MLST Lineage Virulence genes Acid genes Metal genes
RM-NI-131-CTX-23 23 B1 cvaC, espX1, fdeC, iroB, iroC ,iroD ,iroE ,iroN ,iss ,iucA ,iucB ,iucC ,iucD ,iutA ,lpfA , mchF, tsh, ybtP, ybtQ merC, merP, merR, merT emrE, qacEdelta1, ymgB
RM-NI-159-CTX-23 4981 A emrE, qacL cvaC, espX1, fdeC, iroB, iroC, iroD, iroE, iroN, iss, iucA, iucB, iucC, iucD, iutA, mchF, ybtP, ybtQ ymgB, merC, merP, merR, merT
RM-NI-181-CTX-23 2179 AxB1 espX1, fdeC, iroB, iroC, iroD, iroE, iroN, iss, iucA, iucB, iucC, iucD, iutA, lpfA, ybtP, ybtQ emrE ymgB
RM-NI-058-CTX-23 69 D air, eilA, espX1, fdeC, iss, lpfA, ybtP, ybtQ ymgB arsD
RM-NI-094-CTX-23 328 None cif, eae, espA, espB, espF, espJ, espX1, fdeC, lpfA, nleA, nleB2, nleC, tir ymgB terD, terW, terZ

3. Results

  • No isolates were resistant to last line antibiotics, including colistin and carbapenems.

  • The prevalence of AMR E. coli was low (3%) from raw fresh beef and pork samples.

  • Five isolates had confirmed ESBL resistance, one of which also had additional confirmed AmpC resistance. All of these isolates had resistance to Ampicillin, Cefepime, Cefotaxime and Sulfamethoxaoles. The isolate with both ESBL & AmpC resistance also displayed Cefoxitin resistance

  • Table 1 above details the identity of AMR genes, Table 2 details plasmids of AMR interest, and Table 3 details virulence, acid and metal genes of interest from all five AMR E. coli isolates.

4. Discussion

In conclusion, this study indicated a low prevalence of AMR E. coli resistance from 96 pork and 98 beef fresh meat samples on retail sale in NI from September to December 2023. The risk of acquiring AMR related infections through the handling and consumption of retail contaminated meats is very low, provided that good hygiene and cooking practices are followed when handling raw meats (FSA, 2024).


Liability statement

This report has been produced by The Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI) under a contract placed by the Food Standards Agency (FSA). The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of the FSA. AFBI warrants that all reasonable skill and care has been used in performing tests and preparing this report. Notwithstanding this warranty, AFBI shall not be under any liability for loss of profit, business, revenues or any special indirect or consequential damage of any nature whatsoever or loss of anticipated saving or for any increased costs sustained by the client or his or her servants or agents arising in any way whether directly or indirectly as a result of reliance on this report or of any error or defect in this report.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to HallMark Veterinary and Compliance services for providing the samples, to AFBI for lab analysis and results interpretation and for writing this report, and to the FSA for funding this study (FS900189).